Uploaded image for project: 'Yell'
  1. Yell
  2. YELL-438

SMSc 3.5: GetSMSCustomisationIndicator not returning appropriate responses

    Details

    • Type: Bug
    • Status: Closed
    • Priority: Major
    • Resolution: Fixed
    • Affects Version/s: unspecified
    • Fix Version/s: None
    • Component/s: SMSc
    • Labels:
      None
    • Environment:

      Operating System: Linux
      Platform: PC

    • Bugzilla Id:
      3722

      Description

      Please verify that CustomizationInfoService getSMSCustomizationIndicator is
      returning correct responses, both when a valid customer BPID is provided and in
      the invalid case.

      dev wsdl:
      http://centos52-64-yell-dev-mms1:8080/CustomizationInfoService/CustomizationInfoService?wsdl

      Reported by Graham French at Yell:

      > >>>>> Dave,
      > >>>>>
      > >>>>> I've done a little investigation and it looks like in a
      > >>>>> 'normal request' we send you a customBpId with an incorrect
      > >>>>> namespace (http://yell.com/esb/tsa/services instead of the
      > >>>>> correct namespace http://yell.com/esb/tsa/icommon). By
      > >>>>> webservice design this should result in a soap fault coming
      > >>>>> back to us saying 'rubbish data in request' or 'schema
      > >>>>> validation failure'. Instead you send an incorrect response,
      > >>>>> which we fail, so it makes it look like the error is with
      > >>>>> you, when it was our poor data we sent. I can fix our
      > >>>>> request, but you should be sending a soap fault back to us
      > >>>>> when we send rubbish data
      > >>>>>
      > >>>>> Secondly if we send a customBpId that is not in your system,
      > >>>>> then you send a invalid response with no CustomerBpId in it.
      > >>>>>
      > >>>>> And lastly as mentioned before the header is not reflected
      > >>>>> back.
      > >>>>>
      > >>>>> The most pressing issue here is to fix the first instance,
      > >>>>> which is for us to do (I shall put a request in for a new
      > >>>>> deploy to our systems now), but it would be very helpful if
      > >>>>> we could have soap faults returned where our data does not
      > >>>>> match the service definition. The last two are less pressing
      > >>>>> issues, but would preferably be required to go live.
      > >>>>>

        Attachments

          Activity

            People

            • Assignee:
              prashant.balikai Prashant (Inactive)
              Reporter:
              dcostantino Dave Costantino (Inactive)
            • Votes:
              0 Vote for this issue
              Watchers:
              0 Start watching this issue

              Dates

              • Created:
                Updated:
                Resolved: